[This is a rant, I’ll keep it brief ]
To express an item of music (a composer’s conception or a specific musical performance) as a musical-score is a strange and even perverse act:
It forces music (wondrous sounds, a delirium of experience, vast freedom, the ineffable, ...)
into a bureaucracy of:
Meter, strict pitches, crotchet, quaver, semiquaver, demisemiquaver, hemidemisemiquaver (or semidemisemiquaver ), semihemidemisemiquaver, …
How could anyone imagine that there is a good correlation between the former (in red) and the latter (in green)?
To attempt to analyze an item of music via a score is something like interviewing a genius who has been confined in an eighteenth century mental institution !
[I realize that in recent decades there have been many liberalizations of what a musical-score can be. But a bureaucracy is still a bureaucracy, a mental institution is still a mental institution …]